skip to Main Content

Power, Politics, and the Subtle Rewriting of Christian Morality


A Biblical and Historical Examination of the Dominionist Drift in Modern Christianity

Transparent Note


Sections at a Glance

(Click each heading below to expand or collapse)

I. Introduction — A New Religious-Political Synthesis

Overview of how charismatic and political movements have merged under dominionist language such as the Seven Mountain Mandate. Introduces key figures—Paula White, Lance Wallnau, Bill Johnson, and Kenneth Copeland—and explains how the modern church risks exchanging gospel proclamation for cultural control.

Read Full Section ⟶

II. The Spiritual Roots of Dominion

Traces the origins of dominion teaching to C. Peter Wagner and the New Apostolic Reformation, contrasting its top-down theology with Christ’s kingdom that is “not of this world.” (John 18:36)

Read Full Section ⟶

III. Charismatic Repackaging and the Political Pivot

Explains how Bethel Church, Kenneth Copeland Ministries, and Paula White’s White House role connected prophetic rhetoric to political activism, echoing Constantine’s church-state fusion and Hosea’s warning against trusting in worldly power.

Read Full Section ⟶

IV. The Moral Shift — From Holiness to Strategy

Shows how selective morality re-defines sin for political expedience, replacing holiness with inclusion. (Romans 1:26-27; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10)

Read Full Section ⟶

V. The Case of Turning Point USA and Religious Populism

Analyzes how TPUSA Faith merges patriotic rallies with worship imagery, normalizing political idolatry and moral compromise among Christian youth. (Jeremiah 17:5)

Read Full Section ⟶

VI. The Imitation of the Beast — Babylon Reborn

Connects Revelation’s imagery of Babylon and the Beast to recurring alliances between religion and empire—from Nazi Germany to modern civil religion—contrasting them with the heavenly city believers seek. (Hebrews 13:14)

Read Full Section ⟶

VII. Conclusion — Return to the Simplicity of Christ

Calls believers to reject political idolatry and return to faithful discipleship: testing all things by Scripture, loving the sinner while hating sin, and keeping allegiance to the Lamb alone. (Revelation 2:10)

Read Full Section ⟶


I. Introduction — A New Religious-Political Synthesis

In recent years, a new form of religious activism has taken shape in America, blending charismatic fervor with political ambition. Many Christians, weary of moral decay and cultural hostility, have looked for leaders who promise to restore “Christian values” to the nation. Yet beneath the patriotic songs and revival language, another pattern is emerging — one that mirrors the warning of Revelation’s Babylon: religion intertwined with power.

Figures such as Paula White, Lance Wallnau, Bill Johnson, and Kenneth Copeland have advanced a vision known as the Seven Mountain Mandate (7MM), teaching that believers must “take dominion” over seven spheres of culture — government, media, education, business, arts, religion, and family.

This message appeals to a generation seeking influence and relevance, but its premise carries a hidden cost: it redefines the church’s mission from gospel proclamation to cultural control.


Books such as Dominion! How Kingdom Action Can Change the World by C. Peter Wagner, and Invading Babylon: The 7 Mountain Mandate by Lance Wallnau and Bill Johnson, have become standard manifestos for this teaching.

Under this umbrella, a growing number of political movements — notably Turning Point USA Faith — have aligned themselves with charismatic and New Apostolic circles. The collaboration is often presented as “revival” or “kingdom advancement,” yet its methods betray its nature. Stage lights, patriotic worship, and motivational rhetoric replace repentance, discipleship, and humility. The line between spiritual zeal and political idolatry grows thinner each year.

The situation becomes even more troubling when moral boundaries are adjusted to fit political expedience. What once was called sin is now reclassified as strategy. Where the church once stood firm against homosexual practice, some movements now quietly celebrate “gay conservatives” as allies against the transgender revolution. The reasoning is pragmatic — “We must unite to save America.” But the result is compromise: trading holiness for influence, truth for popularity.

This is not revival — it is repackaged syncretism, the same blending of faith and worldliness that corrupted Israel when she sought political alliances instead of covenant faithfulness. The prophetic call of Scripture is timeless:

“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers … come out from among them, and be ye separate.”2 Corinthians 6:14–17

↑ Back to Top


II. The Spiritual Roots of Dominion

The 7MM idea originated in 1975, when Loren Cunningham (founder of Youth With A Mission) and Bill Bright (Campus Crusade for Christ) each claimed to receive a divine vision to “influence” seven key societal spheres.


What began as a call to engagement later evolved into a theology of control, largely through C. Peter Wagner, who formalized the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) as a network of “apostles” and “prophets” directing churches through hierarchical governance.

Wagner’s dominionism redefined evangelism as transforming culture through spiritual authority, not preaching repentance. His book Dominion! codified this idea, urging believers to “take back the nations.”


Later, Lance Wallnau and Bill Johnson popularized this vision in Invading Babylon, declaring that Christians must “occupy the high places” of society for God.

Yet, the structure mirrors the sevenfold spheres outlined decades earlier by occultist Alice A. Bailey in The Externalisation of the Hierarchy (1957), which proposed global spiritual reorganization through seven cultural areas. Though there is no direct link, the philosophical symmetry—a top-down world transformation under spiritual elites—is unmistakable.

Scripture, by contrast, presents a bottom-up kingdom:

“My kingdom is not of this world.” — John 18:36

Christ’s kingdom spreads through humility, service, and witness—not conquest. The church’s weapons are not political leverage but spiritual truth.

“For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds.” — 2 Corinthians 10:4

↑ Back to Top


III. Charismatic Repackaging and the Political Pivot

By the early 2000s, charismatic ministries became the main conduit for dominionist ideas.


Bill Johnson’s Bethel Church (Redding, CA) and Lance Wallnau’s “Kingdom Strategies” conferences taught believers that the goal of revival was not conversion but influence.


Kenneth Copeland Ministries published prayers for “the seven mountains of influence,” blending prosperity theology with dominionism.


Paula White, as spiritual adviser to President Trump, became the most visible bridge between prophetic-charismatic movements and state power.

These networks recast civic involvement as prophetic warfare. 7MM language of “occupying” and “reclaiming” soon merged with political populism.
By 2020, the “Evangelicals for Trump” coalition and TPUSA Faith used revivalist imagery to frame political activism as national repentance.


The church, in effect, became a campaign platform wrapped in worship.

Historically, this alliance echoes Constantine’s fusion of church and empire (A.D. 312–337). While his conversion ended persecution, it politicized faith, producing a state-sponsored Christianity later rebuked by the Reformers.
John Calvin warned: “When the church assumes the sword, she loses the gospel.”


Likewise, the prophet Hosea condemned Israel’s political trust:

“Ephraim hath made many altars to sin.” — Hosea 8:11

Today’s dominionism repeats that error: seeking righteousness through legislation instead of regeneration.

“It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in princes.” — Psalm 118:9

↑ Back to Top


IV. The Moral Shift — From Holiness to Strategy

Evangelical moral teaching once held clear boundaries: homosexuality, adultery, and fornication were all condemned as rebellion against God’s design. Yet in recent years, the language has changed. Homosexuality is increasingly described as a “secondary issue” while the focus of outrage shifts to transgender ideology.

This selective morality is pragmatic, not biblical. Political strategists justify it as inclusion—“gay conservatives share our values”—but Scripture does not rank sins by social acceptability.

“For even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another.” — Romans 1:26–27

“Be not deceived… neither effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind.” — 1 Corinthians 6:9–10

Such compromise mirrors the Democratic Party’s identity politics, courting blocs of voters by affirming lifestyles that Scripture calls sin. Now, segments of the religious right imitate that same tactic under the flag of “unity.”

“Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God?” — James 4:4

Holiness cannot be negotiated for influence. The church’s moral compass must remain fixed, even when politics rewards compromise.

↑ Back to Top


V. The Case of Turning Point USA and Religious Populism

Turning Point USA (TPUSA), founded by Charlie Kirk, demonstrates the convergence of youthful nationalism and religious branding. Through its branch TPUSA Faith, rallies often combine patriotic themes with worship music and political messaging. Scripture verses appear beside campaign slogans, and altar calls are reframed as calls to “save the nation.”

Following Kirk’s death in 2025, memorial gatherings featured both pastors and politicians speaking of him as a “martyr for truth.” While sincere, this language blurred the line between civic heroism and spiritual sainthood—evoking the imperial cult of Rome, where devotion to the state was a form of worship.

“Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm.” — Jeremiah 17:5

In the weeks following Charlie Kirk’s death, reports surfaced of an AI-generated recreation see-1 of his voice and persona being used online to “continue his message.” Whether intended as tribute or satire, such attempts cross a boundary that Scripture has clearly drawn. God forbids every form of communication with the dead—what Scripture calls necromancy—(Deuteronomy 18:10–12; Isaiah 8:19). Though these new methods replace séance tables with silicon chips, the spirit behind them is unchanged. They simulate life where God has taken it away.

When Saul sought counsel from the medium at Endor, God’s judgment fell on him (1 Samuel 28). Today’s digital resurrections perform a similar illusion through algorithms rather than spirits—a technological form of necromancy masquerading as innovation. By giving “voice” to the dead for comfort, influence, or marketing, our culture in effect reenacts the ancient deception: seeking light from darkness.

Such experiments also echo the warning of Revelation 13:14–15, where an image is given breath and speech to deceive the world. The modern fascination with AI personalities—especially when wrapped in religious or patriotic sentiment—reveals how easily humanity can mistake simulation for spirit. To animate the likeness of a man and present it as his continuing witness is to move from remembrance to idolatry. It is not revival but mimicry, another step toward worshiping the image rather than the Creator.

The church must recognize this trend for what it is: a seductive blend of grief, technology, and misplaced devotion. If believers accept such practices uncritically, they risk exchanging the living Word of God for the digital echo of the dead.

At the same time, TPUSA’s inclusion of openly homosexual personalities at events sends mixed signals to Christian youth: morality appears flexible if it serves a conservative cause. This pattern teaches political expedience, not holiness.


Paul rebuked such tolerance: “And ye are puffed up, and have not rather mourned.” 1 Corinthians 5:2

Historically, the same compromise appeared in Byzantine Caesaropapism, 19th-century national churches, and Cold-War civil religion—each time sanctifying national power with religious language, and each time leading to spiritual decline.

↑ Back to Top


VI. The Imitation of the Beast – Babylon Reborn

Revelation’s imagery of Babylon and the Beast represents every age where religion fuses with political and economic power to enforce allegiance.

“The woman… reigneth over the kings of the earth.” — Revelation 17:18

This pattern reappears whenever the church seeks worldly authority.

  • Isaiah 31:1 warns against trusting Egypt for help.
  • Deuteronomy 17:16–17 forbids kings from multiplying power or wealth.

Modern movements that promise revival through government control imitate Babylon’s seduction—using religious speech to justify worldly dominance.

Historical parallels:

  • The German Christian Movement (1930s) fused nationalism and faith under Hitler’s Reich.
  • American civil religion of the 1950s–60s exalted national destiny as divine mission.

“For here have we no continuing city, but we seek one to come.” — Hebrews 13:14

True revival never begins in the halls of power but in the hearts of the humble.

↑ Back to Top


VII. Conclusion – Return to the Simplicity of Christ

Every generation faces the same test of allegiance: will the church walk by the Spirit or by sight?

“Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof.”2 Timothy 3:5

Believers must therefore:

  1. Test every teaching by Scripture (Acts 17:11).
  2. Love sinners yet reject sin (John 8:11).
  3. Refuse political idolatry (Philippians 3:20).
  4. Proclaim repentance and faith (Mark 1:14–15).

The church’s mission is not to ascend the mountains but to bear the Cross.

“Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.”Revelation 2:10

Empires fall, parties fade, but Christ’s kingdom endures forever.

↑ Back to Top


Additional: Notes—References—Links

  1. Note: Portions of this post were developed with AI assistance. All content has been reviewed for accuracy and faithfulness to Scripture. Technology, like any tool, can be used for good or evil; its value depends on the integrity of those who employ it. Here, it is used solely for teaching and clarity.
  2. C. Peter Wagner, Dominion! How Kingdom Action Can Change the World (Chosen Books, 2008) – foundational NAR manual defining “kingdom governance.”
  3. Lance Wallnau & Bill Johnson, Invading Babylon: The 7 Mountain Mandate (Destiny Image, 2013).
  4. Alice A. Bailey, The Externalisation of the Hierarchy (Lucis Trust, 1957).
  5. The Guardian, April 5, 2025, “Paula White and Trump’s Faith Office.”
  6. Turning Point USA Faith, mission statement: tpusafaith.com.
  7. Eusebius, Life of Constantine, Book II, for historical precedent of church-state fusion.
  8. The Gospel Coalition, “A Critique of the Seven Mountain Mandate,” 2019.
  9. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion, “Dominion Theology and the New Apostolic Reformation,” 2022.

↑ Back to Top


Footnotes:

  1. Note: This video raises valid points about AI and necromancy, though some wording reflects the creator’s personal tone and background. The content is shared, not endorsement of every expression used, therefore, viewers are encouraged to weigh the message with discernment, focusing on the substance rather than the manner of presentation. ↩︎
image_pdfView as PDFimage_printPrint this Article
infocache

Back To Top