The Drift of 1st Century Apostolic Teaching
Part of Ekklesia — A Closer Look series.
Return to Table of Contents
Before tracing the drift from the apostolic ekklesia to the later institutional church, the New Testament baseline must be established. This page follows that development through six movements and then calls for the recovery of the assembly Christ promised to build.
Use the Table of Contents below to open each section and jump directly to the matching portion of the article.
Table of Contents
Click image to enlarge | Click section to expand sub-sections
-
►Section One
Section One — The Apostolic Ekklesia — What the New Testament Actually Describes
The New Testament baseline: assembly, homes, priesthood of believers, one new man, and the Lord's Supper as a meal.
-
►Section Two
Section Two — The Gradual Mutation — Second Through Fourth Century Developments
The gradual second-to-fourth century transformation from apostolic assembly to institutional church.
-
►Section Three
Section Three — Historic Premillennialism — The Early Chiliast View and How It Differed From Later Futurist Systems
The early chiliast view and why it differs from later futurist dispensational systems.
-
►Section Four
Section Four — The Reformation's Half-Finished Work
What the Reformation recovered, what it left unrecovered, and why ecclesiology remained unfinished.
-
►Section Five
Section Five — Futurist Premillennial Frameworks — What They Teach and Where Their Tensions Lie
A fair summary of futurist premillennial frameworks and the tensions within the system.
-
►Section Six
Section Six — How the Inherited "Church" Made Futurist Frameworks Thinkable
How the inherited concept of church made later futurist frameworks thinkable.
-
►Conclusion
Recovering the Ekklesia
The call to recover the ekklesia as the assembly Christ promised to build.
Introduction
This article traces a single thread running through two millennia of Christian history: how the gradual replacement of the apostolic ekklesia with an institutional church, a shift encoded in the very terminology we use, created the theological conditions that made modern futurist theological frameworks thinkable. The argument is not merely that these frameworks err on certain points of prophetic interpretation. The argument is that these systems rest on an ecclesiological foundation that was already corrupted centuries before their key architects ever articulated them, and that the Reformation, for all its recovery of soteriology, left this foundation largely intact.